A Big Tech/biotech whistleblower, who is concealing his true identity for now and going by “Liberty Man” has been working on a documentary series for Infowars and he joins Alex Jones to explain why the Globalists are so desperate to force-inject us and why we must educate ourselves as much as possible about this.
He says, “The reality is they’re deploying technology on us and if you don’t understand that technology, you will not understand what’s going on. If you’re a politician and you don’t understand the DARPA technology that’s being deployed on us right now, you are unfit to govern.
“We’re going to be digging into basically, what I think is the Rosetta Stone…It’s going to give you the perspective on why they’re pushing this stuff so hard. For the doctors and scientists out there, you’re going to understand all the vaccine injuries going on right now. But more importantly, you’re going to understand two key things of the agenda and why they’re pushing so hard; what this means to them…
TWO PARALLEL REVOLUTIONS AT PLAY
“To understand these shots, you need to understand that there are two parallel revolutions at play, from a technology perspective. There’s a biotech side to it and a nanotech side to it.”
He says the Antibody-Dependant Enhancement (ADE) and “pathogenic priming” side effects that we’ve seen – and where most of the focus has been in the independent news – this comes from the mRNA gene therapy and the biotech side of this operation.
What less people have been focusing on has been the graphene oxide. Readers of this blog already know about how researchers in Spain have been doing numerous analyses of the contents of the vials, including electron microscopy, spectroscopy and liquid chromatography and they were the first to announce that the injections contain a considerable dose of graphene oxide nanoparticles, making up over 99% of the “medication”. We also know, from Pfizer whistleblower, Karen Kingston that graphene oxide was redacted as an ingredient from Pfizer’s US patent, due to its status as a “trade secret”.
Liberty Man confirms that the “worms” seen on the masks and swabs and the magnetization effects of human bodies that we’ve been seeing are all examples of functionalized graphene.
Liberty Man asks, “How does the Hydrogel deliver the mRNA payload into our cells? The answer is graphene oxide,” which he says is also instrumental for their plan to make humans into nodes on the Internet of Things, as was first reported here in 2015 from the whistleblower pseudonymously-named “DJ” from Level9News, who described DoD patents, such as #3951134, “Distant Brain Reading and Brainwave Manipulation” [via satellite!] and #6011991 “Remote Brain-Computer Interface Neural Monitoring”, both of which relate to GeoINT and the JADE II software.
These relate to Agenda 2030 and the Smart Grids. He says, “They want to make you a part of the infrastructure of Smart Cities,” and Alex chimes in that Jeffrey Epstein was involved at every level of this.
He says that everyone loves to hate on Bill Gates but he suspects, after reading The Singularity is Near, that its author, Ray Kurzweil is the Technical Product Manager running the scientists in this whole operation, whereas Bill Gates was the Program Manager, managing the funding.
A NEW MANHATTAN PROJECT
“So again, why are they pushing so hard on all of this stuff?” he asks. “What Ray Kurzweil wants to do with nanotech, fundamentally is he wants to get in; he wants to get control of those [DNA] base pairs, he wants to own that cell. And to do that, he’s got to be able to…communicate with the DNA of that cell. And that’s what the nanotech’s all about…
“This is a new Manhattan Project that we’re going through, right now and it’s a big government…worldwide democide operation,” that has its theoretical roots back in the 1950s, when they mapped it all out. He says that we are the test subjects in what will become life-extension technologies for themselves.
Alex Jones agrees, saying that it’s about 1,000 times bigger than the Manhattan Project, with massive amounts of compartmentalization.
As for our current pandemic, Liberty Man says they began loading graphene oxide into the regular flu and other vaccines, back in 2017 and 2018. “[Graphene oxide] is how we can get them. This is the Crime Against Humanity, right here.”
He speculates that the Wuhan lab is where they worked on the synthetic spike protein. “That’s the biotech side. I also want to say that I think Dr Andrew Kaufman, Jon Rappaport, Thomas Cowan and others are vindicated about the no-isolation of the novel coronavirus…
“As a research community, we have not had a full grasp…and it’s allowing them to gain more ground. We’re losing ground. We can turn the tide, if we’re armed with the full truth. Then we have a fighting chance, here…
IT’S ABOUT TO GET “VERY REAL”
“OK, final points…there’s a team in Spain, there’s a team in Argentina; they’ve now shown that saline solution is loaded with graphene oxide…but we need a tidal wave of infowarriors to get out on this.”
He also refers to the unprecedented approval processes of drugs for neurodegenerative disease and he believes they are scrambling to take advantage of an upcoming vaxx-induced epidemic of these. Also, the first blood thinner product made for children, to protect them from blood clots was just released, again to take advantage of an imminent epidemic of blood clots in children.
He says it’s about to get “very real” and it will make the last year and a half look like a “walk in the park. We are weeks away from this thing going to the next level.”
If it feels like we’re living in a dystopian science fiction movie, this is due to all the predictive programming that has been relentlessly served up by the entertainment industry since the mid-20th century.
Like most of what the Globalists do, the COVID vaxx project has multiple purposes and two main motives are controlling you at the DNA level, which is something Elana Freeland has been talking about for years and which I’ve been posting here since 2015 and the other is to use us as their guinea pigs for their own life-extension purposes.
Alexandra Bruce https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/why-are-they-so-desperate-to-force-inject-us/
9/08/2021
From comments
Kate
There are other scientists who have also done a deep dive on the
drawbacks of the COVID vaccine that should be included for your audience
to learn about and to team up with you and “Liberty Man”.
Bill Gate’s Top Virologist Urges Caution about the COVID 19 Vaccine: (Bill Gates was funding Wuhan research)
Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche is a pro-vaxxer. His issue with the COVID 19
Vaccine is the lack of aggregating all the appropriate research in an
open and
truly objective conference of scientists. Politicians are making policy
when the scientists are still discovering new information that should
guide policy.
His request: “The following document is a key update of my executive
summary and addresses important questions, comments and replies that
have been raised on my emergency appeal of global concern. I repeat with
utmost urgency my call for a public scientific debate with the WHO,
qualified experts and authorities worldwide.”
“The science behind the catastrophic consequences of thoughtless
human intervention in the Covid-19 pandemic”– Geert Vanden Bossche (DVM,
PhD, March 13 2021)
I am herewith posting a list of a series of publications that have been
instrumental in providing enlightening insights on the interplay between
Covid-19 and the host immune system. They provide so to speak critical
pieces of the puzzle that I have been putting together. Entire puzzles
are rarely published. That’s why publications rarely bring solutions to
complex problems. For your convenience, I have allocated the
publications I consulted to different categories. As you will
appreciate, I have been tapping into several disciplines. To ‘solve’ a
problem as complex as a viral pandemic, one has to draw from several
different fields, including epidemiology, (molecular) biology, virology,
immunology, genetics, vaccinology and even biophysics. Again, this is
why ‘finished’ puzzles cannot be found in science journals specifically
dedicated to a specific field of interest. The publications attached
support my scientific interpretation of how a natural pandemic develops
and how its natural course can be profoundly disturbed by human
intervention. For your convenience, I attach a synopsis of my
science-based postulate below. I invite scientists from all over the
world to read it and reflect on how we could shift gears and possibly
intervene in ways that prevent the emergence of additional highly
infectious Covid-19 variants and eventually enable eradication of
variants that are circulating already.
Synopsis
I cannot emphasize enough how passionate I am about vaccines, but I
cannot accept that we use vaccines which, instead of mitigating the
Covid-19 pandemic, are now at risk of dramatically aggravating it.
“A last word of caution to all those pretending the Covid-19 pandemic is toning down” By Geert Vanden Bossche
Updated: 3 days ago
Synopsis The current expansion in prevalence of infectious Sars-CoV-2
variants is highly problematic because it erodes natural Ab-based,
variant-nonspecific immunity in the non-vaccinated part of the
population. The high infectivity rate that results from this expansion
not only further enhances the expansion of these variants but may also
drive natural selection of viral variants that are featured by an even
higher level of infectiousness. Erosion, therefore, of natural Ab-based,
variant-nonspecific immunity promotes breeding and transmission of more
infectious viral variants in the non-vaccinated part of the population.
On the other hand, mass vaccination promotes natural selection of
increasingly vaccine immunity (VI)-escaping variants in the vaccinated
part of the population. Taken together, mass vaccination conducted on a
background of high infectivity rates enables more infectious,
increasingly VI-escaping variants to expand in prevalence. This
evolution inevitably results in inclining morbidity rates in both the
unvaccinated and vaccinated population and precipitates the emergence of
circulating viral variants that will eventually fully resist
vaccine-mediated immunity (VMI). This is why mass vaccination campaigns
should not be conducted during a pandemic of a highly mutable virus, let
alone during a pandemic of more infectious variants (unless
transmission-blocking vaccines are used!).
Separate Study from European Scientists:
Using the Adverse Drug Reactions (ADR) database of the European
Medicines Agency and of the Dutch National Register (lareb.nl), the
researchers were able to assess the number of cases reporting severe
side effects as well as the cases with fatal side effects as a result of
a COVID vaccine.
“We need to accept that around 16 cases will develop severe adverse
reactions from COVID-19 vaccines per 100,000 vaccinations delivered, and
approximately four people will die from the consequences of being
vaccinated per 100,000 vaccinations delivered. Adopting the point
estimate of NNTV = 16,000 (95% CI, 9000–50,000) to prevent one
COVID-19-related death, for every six (95% CI, 2–11) deaths prevented by
vaccination, we may incur four deaths as a consequence of or associated
with the vaccination. Simply put: As we prevent three deaths by
vaccinating, we incur two deaths. This lack of clear benefit should
cause governments to rethink their vaccination policy.”
The researchers estimates suggest that we have to exchange 4 fatal and
16 serious side effects per 100,000 vaccinations in order to save the
lives of 2-11 individuals per 100,000 vaccinations. This puts the risk
vs. benefit of COVID vaccination on the same order of magnitude.
Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, MD, PhD, from the Stanford University School of Medicine recently shared that the survival rate for people under 70 years of age is about 99.95 percent. He also said that COVID is less dangerous than the flu for children. This comes based on approximately 50 studies that have been published, and information showing that more children in the U.S. have died from the flu than COVID. Here’s a meta analysis published by the WHO that gives this number. The number comes based on the idea that many more people than we have the capacity to test have most likely been infected.
Furthermore, as the study points out, one has to be mindful of a
“positive” case determined by a PCR test. A PCR test cannot determine
whether someone is infectious or not, and a recent study found that it’s
highly likely that at least 50 percent of “positive” cases have been
“false positives.”
[Source:New Study Questions The Safety of COVID Vaccinations & Urges Governments To Take Notice
General, Metaphysics / June 29, 2021]
——————————————————————————————————————————————–
“COVID Vaccines May Bring Avalanche of Neurological Disease”
Analysis by Dr. Joseph Mercola Fact Checked
The typical unprecedented vaccine takes 12 years to develop, and of all
the unprecedented vaccines in development, only 2% are projected to ever
make it through all Phase 2 and 3 clinical phases of testing The
COVID-19 vaccine was developed with Operation Warp Speed in less than
one year, which makes it virtually impossible to assess safety and
efficacy, as the vaccine has not been adequately tested Five months
into the vaccination campaign, statistics tell a frightening story.
Research shows deaths are 15 times higher during the first 14 days after
the first COVID injection among people over the age of 60, compared to
those who aren’t vaccinated Another study shows that after COVID-19
vaccines were implemented, overall death rates have increased, with the
exception of a few areas. It appears countries in which COVID 19
vaccines have not raised mortality rates are also not using glyphosate
In the next 10 to 15 years, we are likely to see spikes in prion
diseases, autoimmune diseases, neurodegenerative diseases at younger
ages, and blood disorders such as blood clots, hemorrhaging, stroke and
heart failure science of these novel injections and recently published
an excellent paper on this.
In this interview, return guest Stephanie Seneff, Ph.D., a senior
research scientist at MIT for over five decades, discusses the COVID-19
vaccines. Since 2008, her primary focus has been glyphosate and sulfur,
but in the last year, she took a deep-dive into the COVID topic. “To
have developed this incredibly new technology so quickly, and to skip so
many steps in the process of evaluating [its safety], it’s an insanely
reckless thing that they’ve done,” she says. “My instinct was that this
is bad, and I needed to know [the truth]. So, I really dug into the
research literature by the people who’ve developed these vaccines, and
then more extensive research literature around those topics. And I don’t
see how these vaccines can possibly be doing anything good. When you
weigh the good against the bad, I can’t see how they could possibly be
winning, from what I’ve seen.”
“Significant Death Toll Will Rise in Months and Years to Come” by Stephanie Seneff, Ph.D.
Five months into the vaccination campaign, statistics tell a frightening
story. Seneff cites research showing deaths are 14.6 times more
frequent during the first 14 days after the first COVID injection among
people over the age of 60, compared to those who aren’t vaccinated. That
is extraordinary. You can read the full paper here. Other data,
reviewed in the video above, show that after COVID-19 vaccines were
implemented, overall death rates have increased, with the exception of a
few areas. Interestingly, Seneff believes she may have discovered why.
It appears countries in which COVID-19 vaccines have not raised
mortality rates are also not using glyphosate. “I immediately suspected
glyphosate when I started to see COVID-19,” Seneff says. “I’ve written a
book on glyphosate called ‘Toxic Legacy,’ and I have an entire chapter
in that book on the immune system. Glyphosate, I believe, is a train
wreck for the innate immune system, and when your immune system is weak,
your body has to overreact to the virus. It can’t kill the virus. So,
it ends up [causing] collateral damage and wrecking your tissues. You
get into this cytokine storm kind of situation where you destroy your
lungs and you can’t cope. It’s not really the virus. It’s the immune
reaction to the virus that’s killing you, and that’s because your immune
system is too weak. If you have a strong innate immune system, I
believe you wouldn’t even get symptoms from COVID-19.
——————————————————————————————————————————————-
Meanwhile – Scientists are Being Censored because of their Research Results Highlighting the Drawbacks of
a Vaccine Rushed to Market
Overwhelming pressure from governments and the public has compelled
social media platforms to take unprecedented action on what users share
online in the pandemic. But who fact checks the fact checkers? Laurie
Clarke reports
In a move likened to the way governments have assumed emergency powers in response to the covid pandemic, Facebook has removed 16 million pieces of its content and added warnings to around 167 million. YouTube has removed more than 850 000 videos related to “dangerous or misleading covid-19 medical information.”
While a portion of that content is likely to be wilfully wrongheaded or vindictively misleading, the pandemic is littered with examples of scientific opinion that have been caught in the dragnet—resulting in their removal or de-prioritisation, depending on the platform and context. This underscores the difficulty of defining scientific truth, prompting the bigger question of whether social media platforms such as Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and YouTube should be tasked with this at all.
“I think it’s quite dangerous for scientific content to be labelled as misinformation, just because of the way people might perceive that,” says Sander van der Linden, professor of social psychology in society at Cambridge University, UK. “Even though it might fit under a definition [of misinformation] in a very technical sense, I’m not sure if that’s the right way to describe it more generally because it could lead to greater politicisation of science, which is undesirable.”
Krofter
Good work Liberty Man. One missing piece of info… the reason why GO is not listed as an ingredient on the labels of the jabs is because hydrogel (which has GO as its primary component) is a patented product. Gates has co-funded with DARPA to help Profusa to create hydrogel. This is why he said the jabs couldn’t be made by other entities because of GO patents HE holds.https://secularheretic.substack.com/p/graphene-oxide-epidemic-2-the-transhumanist
