Dr Li-Meng Yan και Dr. Ai Fen -Wuhan

 Dr. Li-Meng Yan is a scientist who was working at the Hong Kong School of Public Health when she turned whistleblower on the Chinese Government, after she alleged they knew about the spread of the coronavirus before publicly acknowledging the outbreak. As a result, Dr Yan claims she had to flee to the US for her own safety and is now determined to spread her findings to the world. She joined the Loose Women from a secret location to tell us why she felt compelled to speak out, even if it meant putting her life on the line. The Chinese National Health Commission, World Health Organisation and University Of Hong Kong dispute her claims. From series 24, broadcast on 11/09/20

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Lq3_rsBJ9w

Loose Women

 

Chinese Virologist Says Dr Fauci Emails Prove Her Wuhan Lab Leak Claims

A trove of Fauci's emails covering the onset of the coronavirus outbreak was released this week to media under a freedom of information request.

World

 

 

Washington:

A Chinese virologist, who was among the first to suggest the COVID-19 virus leaked from a Wuhan lab, said that US top coronavirus advisor Anthony Fauci's emails prove that she was right all along.

A trove of Fauci's emails covering the onset of the coronavirus outbreak was released this week to media under a freedom of information request.

In one email sent last April, an executive at a health charity thanked Fauci for publicly stating that scientific evidence does not support the lab-leak theory.

Dr. Li-Meng Yan was one of the first to research the emerging coronavirus and previously revealed she was forced into hiding after accusing Beijing of a cover-up, New York Post reported.

Now, as international leaders finally focus on her Wuhan lab-leak theory, the scientist told Newsmax that Fauci's emails contain "a lot of useful information" suggesting he always knew more than he revealed.

"They verify my work from the very beginning, even from last January, that these people know what happened, but they choose to hide for the Chinese Communist Party and for their own benefits," Yan insisted speaking of the treasure trove of documents released this week.

"He knows all these things," she insisted of Fauci and the apparent gain-of-function work carried out by the now-notorious Wuhan Institute of Virology in the heart of the city where the pandemic first emerged.

One email, she said, showed that "Dr. Fauci even back to 1st of February last year immediately realized that there would be gain-of-function experiment involved in the COVID-19 virus."

Over 3,000 pages of emails were obtained by the Washington Post, Buzzfeed News and CNN through Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests, date from January to June 2020.

Πηγη: εδω  

https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/covid-19-chinese-virologist-says-fauci-emails-prove-her-wuhan-lab-leak-claims-2457013

WION

3,58 εκ. εγγεγραμμένοι

Dr. Ai Fen is a doctor at the Wuhan Central Hospital. She was perhaps among the first doctors to discover the Wuhan virus. After speaking out against the authorities, Dr. Ai Fen has gone missing. WION's Palki Sharma brings you the Ai Fen revelations. 

Η γιατρος ΕΞΑΦΑΝΙΣΤΗΚΕ...

 

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=beDmuDDknNI

 

 

 

 

 

Ο Ιταλος γιατρος Francesco Zambon πρωην ερευνητης στο Π.Ο.Υ. στην Βενετια, ειχε καταγγειλει πως το Π.Ο.Υ. τον αναγκασε να αλλαξει τους αριθμους και την αναφορα για το κορονοιο. Αφου αρνηθηκε, σημερα βρισκεται χωρις εργασια και ανγκασμενος να πουλησει το σπιτι και το πιανο του

 

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TeXrOJ7C0HY

Ας διαβασουμε και ενα αρθρο για αυτο το θεμα:

‘I was treated like a traitor’: An interview with WHO whistleblower Francesco Zambon

27 May 2021, 10:00am

Francesco Zambon is calling the World Health Organisation (WHO) to account. Zambon, who was based at the WHO’s Venice bureau, claims that the WHO suppressed critical information about the pandemic to serve the political interests of member countries. There are conflicts of interest at the highest levels of the institution, he says. As a result, according to Zambon, the world lost valuable time in mounting effective defences against the pandemic.

Back in May 2020, Zambon and his team wrote a report for the WHO called: 'An unprecedented challenge: Italy’s first response to Covid-19'. The report, drafted in a time of emergency, was meant to help other nations still untouched by the virus, and it could have saved lives, says Zambon. But soon after it was published, the document came under fire from high cadres within the WHO. It did not survive more than 24 hours online before being taken down. I spoke to Francesco Zambon to find out why:

So why was your report taken down? Hadn't it been approved?

There is a sentence in the report which states that the Italian pandemic plan dated back to 2006, and was not updated as it should have been. Since Dr Ranieri Guerra was a general director at the Italian health ministry between 2014 and 2017, it was partially his responsibility to update this. He pressured me to write that the plan had been updated. But we couldn't do that. We saw that it was just a copy and paste from 2006. We could only write that it was reconfirmed. An updated pandemic plan might have saved lives. On this, the prosecutors in Bergamo are investigating on behalf of the victims.

The huge conflict of interest was conspicuous. During the pandemic, Guerra was appointed as special envoy to Rome to assist the Italian Government. The texts of the chats just acquired by Bergamo's magistrates show that the cabinet of the Italian health minister wasn’t happy with our report. Subsequently our work was buried. (Guerra says he had nothing to do with the decision to spike the report. He also says the responsibility for pandemic preparation plans are broadly the remit of individual regions within Italy, for which he was not responsible).

It must have been a blow for you and all your team.

Of course I am not an utopian. But we always have to remember that the WHO is here to protect the health of every human on the planet. I was conscious of geopolitical influences in every UN agency, but could not imagine that the WHO lacked independence. The main issue is why the report was really withdrawn and the power dynamics between the WHO and member states. From the beginning of the story, they were just trying to divert attention. Italy is only a secondary aspect. What really matters is what happened in China.

Was there an attempt to control and manipulate the narrative and the chronology of the pandemic?

Yes, this is the important point: controlling the narrative. What immediately provoked the report to be taken down was the 300 words of what we call 'The China box' in the report. This was a chronology of the first months of the pandemic. The WHO office in China called me to say that I should take it down immediately. Not because it was wrong – it was mostly based on WHO sources – but because it was very political.

As you know, just a few weeks ago an independent panel chosen by WHO member states issued a document with the title 'Make it the last pandemic', comparing Covid-19 to the Chernobyl accident.

This is very significant. Firstly, the document talks about the lack of independence of the WHO and the importance of timing. The report calls February 2020 the 'lost month'. The parallel with Chernobyl is crucial. Everybody knows that in Chernobyl there was a lack of information from the Soviet Union. The same is true for Covid-19 and China.

I noticed that while Trump was in office, when one posted a statement from a scientist supporting the view that the virus originated in a lab, it would be flagged immediately on social media. Now the mainstream narrative has changed and one can share such views more easily. How do you explain this? And what do you think about the investigating team sent by the WHO looking into how the virus originated?

Now it is more fashionable and acceptable to say these things. As for the WHO mission, it was a farce since the host country, China, was given the power to pick the members of the team. The results were contradictory to say the least. Finally, the WHO itself had to admit that the mission was inconclusive and further investigation was needed.

So was Trump right to criticise the WHO?

Trump was correct to attack the WHO and accuse it of not being independent. Trump accused China of putting the world in a catastrophic recession. He was right.

One should also remember that there is a big difference between the WHO being somehow dependent on a democratic country, like the USA or Italy, which have some checks and balances, and being dependent on a totalitarian state like China. Isn't the latter much more dangerous?

Of course. We just have to think of the brave Chinese doctor, Li Wenliang, who sounded the alarm on WeChat and was silenced. In Italy, at least I am still free to talk to the press. In China, I would have been arrested or would have disappeared by now.

What other things did China (and consequently the WHO) fail to tell us which could have been helpful in the first months?

It was just a simple doctor from Codogno in Lombardy, who, by testing somebody who didn't have direct travel links to China, took the initiative and discovered the so-called patient zero in Italy. We were told not to mention this episode in the report, because it put the WHO, and the Italian Government in a bad light. I replied: 'Are you crazy? You want to hide what really helped us discover the pandemic?' The report was subsequently taken away from me and buried.

What happened to you after this?

Well, when the whole scandal broke out and so many journalists from all sorts of media wanted to talk to me, the chief of WHO human resources called me and offered me a post in Bulgaria.

In exile?

I don’t know! I asked him: 'To do what?' And he replied: 'We will figure it out but we are concerned about your health'. After this, I resigned and started a court case against the WHO because they didn't recognise my status as whistleblower. Obviously I had touched the 'big fishes' and nobody in the organisation dared to protect me. I was treated as if I was radioactive, as a traitor basically.

How do you see the future of the WHO?

I still think we need it but it should be radically reformed. This is why I exposed these facts.

The WHO says that the report was taken down because 'factual inaccuracies were found in the text'. In a statement, the WHO said: 'The WHO Regional Office for Europe removed the document from the website, with the intent to correct errors and republish it. By the time corrections were made, WHO had established a new global mechanism – called the 'Intra-action Review' – as a standard tool for countries to evaluate their responses and share lessons learned. The original document ('An unprecedented challenge') was therefore never republished.’

'The Small Fish' by Francesco Zambon is published by the Feltrinelli press

Written byManfred Manera

 

Πηγη: εδω https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/-i-was-treated-like-a-traitor-an-interview-with-who-whistleblower-francesco-zambon

 

Ωστε να μην σχετιστει ο κορονοιος με το Wuhan... μιλαγαν για πολιτικη αποφαση που παρθηκε σε ενα "πολυ υψηλο πανγκοσμιο επιπεδο"...  ποιο ειναι αυτο το επιπεδο που περασε και πανω απο την αποφαση του πρωην πλανηταρχη ωστε να ερευνηθει η προελευση του ιου; Και ΓΙΑΤΙ παρθηκε μια τετοια αποφαση;

Νομπελίστας και Εφευρέτης Μεθόδου PCR Κάρι Μούλις για Φάουτσι και "Ειδικούς"

 

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b6a49feXh3Q

Dr. Kary Mullis: Η "παράφρων διάνοια" που έφερε επανάσταση στην επιστήμη της ζωής

 Ο Dr. Kary Mullis (Κέρι Μάλις) ήταν κατά πάσα πιθανότητα η πιο ιδιόρρυθμη προσωπικότητα που έχει κερδίσει ποτέ το Νόμπελ Χημείας.

Ο Νομπελίστας Χημείας το 1993, που έφυγε από τη ζωή από πνευμονία στις 7 Αυγούστου, ήταν γόνος μίας αγροτικής οικογένειας στο Λενουάρ της Βορείου Καρολίνας. Απέκτησε το ενδιαφέρον του για την επιστήμη όταν έμαθε στο σχολείο πώς να κατασκευάζει αυτοσχέδιες ρουκέτες και διασκέδαζε εκτοξεύοντας... βατράχια με αυτές

Ο Μάλις σπούδασε αρχικά χημεία, εγκατέλειψε στη συνέχεια τις σπουδές του και εργάσθηκε σε φούρνο, κατέθεσε το διδακτορικό του στο γνωστό Πανεπιστήμιο του Berkeley στη χρυσή εποχή των ναρκωτικών.

Ενώ οδηγούσε του ήλθε η επιφοίτηση και επινόησε μία τεχνική που έμελλε να αποτελέσει το σημείο καμπής για την επιστήμη της βιολογίας: την αλυσιδωτή αντίδραση της πολυμεράσης, μία σειρά από ένζυμα που μπορεί να αντιγράψει εκατομμύρια φορές ένα μικρό τμήμα του DNA.

Η επαναστατική του αυτή ανακάλυψη επέτρεψε την ανάγνωση του ανθρώπινου γενώματος, διευκολύνοντας τη διάγνωση γενετικών ανωμαλιών, την αναγνώριση νεκρών και εντοπίζοντας από το γενετικό τους υλικό τους εγκληματίες.

Όπως τονίζει η Wasington Post,  ο ιδιοφυής αυτός επιστήμονας «κατά πάσα πιθανότητα είναι η πιο ιδιόμορφη προσωπικότητα που έχει κερδίσει ποτέ το Νόμπελ Χημείας». Διότι δεν ήσαν λίγες οι φορές που ο Μάλις κατόρθωνε να εκπλήξει όλον τον επιστημονικό κόσμο για τις ανορθόδοξες απόψεις του και την ιδιότυπη συμπεριφορά του.

Το 1994, μόλις έναν χρόνο μετά την απονομή του Νόμπελ, ο Μάλις προσεκλήθη για να κλείσει με την ομιλία του το συνέδριο της Ευρωπαϊκής Εταιρείας Κλινικής Έρευνας και να αναφερθεί στη συνταρακτική του ανακάλυψη. Αντ' αυτού, όμως, ο Μάλις επέλεξε στην ομιλία του να αναπτύξει τη δική του θεωρία ότι το AIDS δεν οφείλεται σε έναν ιό, αλλά προκαλείται από την έκθεση σε άλλους παθογενείς παράγοντες.

«Ο Μάλις προκάλεσε τρανταχτά γέλια στο ακροατήριό του, όταν ανακοίνωσε πως σκοπεύει "να κατευθυνθεί προς τη Σεβίλλη όπου υπάρχει ένα φεστιβάλ που κάποιος μπορεί να μεθύσει όλη τη νύχτα". Στην αρχή της ομιλίας του, που ήταν χαοτική και ασυνάρτητη, πρόβαλε μία σειρά διαφανειών με γεωμετρικά σχήματα που προβάλλονταν στα σώματα γυμνών γυναικών», όπως αναφέρει στο σχετικό δημοσίευμά της για την ατυχή εκείνη εκδήλωση η ισπανική εφημερίδα El Pais. Ο Μάλις απέδειξε πως ακόμη κι ένας Νομπελίστας, όσο ιδιοφυία και να θεωρείται στον τομέα του, μπορεί κάλλιστα να είναι κι ένα όλως διόλου ανεύθυνο πρόσωπο.

Μάλιστα, η Γαλλίδα ιολόγος Φρανσουάζ Μπαρέ-Σινουσί, που εντόπισε το 1983 τον ιό VIH του AIDS, δήλωνε αποτροπιασμένη πως «ουδέποτε μίλησα και ούτε που θα μιλήσω ποτέ με έναν άνθρωπο που εκστομίζει τέτοιες ηλιθιότητες. Τα επιστημονικά δεδομένα έχουν αποδείξει σαφέστατα πως υπάρχει σύνδεση ανάμεσα στον ιό και την ασθένεια. Αυτού του τύπου οι ανακοινώσεις είναι επικίνδυνες. Μεγάλος αριθμός ασθενών σταμάτησαν την θεραπεία τους εξαιτίας αυτών των αβάσιμων παρατηρήσεων και κατέληξαν από την ασθένεια. Θα πρέπει να τους σταματήσουμε διότι είναι επικίνδυνοι».

Αλλά η ιδέα του για το AIDS δεν ήταν η μόνη αβάσιμη θεωρία που έχει διατυπώσει ο Μάλις. Όταν το 1986 εγκατέλειψε την εταιρεία Cetus, στην οποία εργαζόταν όταν ανακάλυψε την αλυσιδωτή αντίδραση της πολυμεράσης και πήγε να εργασθεί για την Xytrong στο Σαν Ντιέγκο, για την οποία ανακάλυψε μία μελάνη ευαίσθητη στις ακτίνες UV, ο Μάλις άρχισε να αμφισβητεί την ευστάθεια της θεωρίας για την τρύπα του όζοντος και μετατράπηκε σε έναν διαπρύσιο επικριτή της.

Ο Μάλις δημοσίευσε την αυτοβιογραφία του «Χορεύοντας γυμνός στα Χωράφια του Μυαλού» (Dancing Naked in the Mind Field) το 1998. Ο διαπρεπής χημικός στις σελίδες του διηγείται πως μία νύκτα του 1985 συνάντησε σε ένα δάσος στην ιδιοκτησία του στην Κομητεία του Μεντοσίνο στην Καλιφόρνια, ένα ρακούν.

«Καλησπέρα δόκτωρ», τον χαιρέτισε το ρακούν, «που ενδέχεται να ήταν και εξωγήινος», σύμφωνα με την παραληρηματική αφήγηση του Μάλις. Στην ίδια αυτοβιογραφία του διηγείται τις εμπειρίες και τους πειραματισμούς του με ψυχεδελικά ναρκωτικά, αμφεταμίνες και LSD, υποστηρίζοντας πως αυτά «ανοίγουν το μυαλό». «Στο Μπέρκλεϊ τότε τα έπαιρναν πολλοί και ήταν σαφώς πολύ πιο σημαντικά απ' όσα μαθήματα παρακολουθούσα».

Μάλιστα ο ίδιος ο εφευρέτης του LSD Άλμπερτ Χόφμαν τόνιζε πως ο Μάλις του αποκάλυψε πως το ψυχότροπο αυτό φάρμακο τον βοήθησε να αναπτύξει τη θεωρία του για την αλυσιδωτή αντίδραση της πολυμεράσης, που βοηθά στον πολλαπλασιασμό ειδικών αλυσίδων DNA.

Η αντίδραση αυτή, γνωστής ως PCR, άλλαξε για πάντα την επιστήμη. Κάθε κύτταρο διατηρεί στον μικροσκοπικό του πυρήνα δύο μέτρα DNA πλεγμένα σε άρρηκτους δεσμούς. Σε αυτές τις αλυσίδες βρίσκεται αποτυπωμένο το εγχειρίδιο λειτουργίας της ζωής. Μέχρι το 1985 οι επιστήμονες χρειάζονταν τεράστιες ποσότητες DNA προκειμένου να αναλύσουν τις γενετικές πληροφορίες. Με τη θέρμανση του μορίου του DNA, οι δύο αλυσίδες του χωρίζουν. Με την πρόσθεση των βασικών στοιχείων του DNA και με τη βοήθεια ενός ενζύμου, κάθε ανεξάρτητη αλυσίδα χρησιμοποιείται ως μήτρα για να δημιουργηθεί η συμπληρωματική της και για να πλασθεί ένα τέλειο αντίτυπο του πρωτογενούς μορίου. Με τον τρόπο αυτόν είναι δυνατόν να αποκτηθούν εκατομμύρια αντίτυπα σε απειροελάχιστο χρόνο.

Σύμφωνα με τον ίδιο, ο Μάλις εκστόμισε το «εύρηκα» την ώρα που οδηγούσε από το Έμερβιλ, έδρα της Cetus, προς το Μεντοσίνο, το ίδιο σημείο που είχε την συνάντηση με το ομιλούν ρακούν, ή τον εξωγήινο --ανάλογα με το ποιο προτιμά κανείς. Μία διαδρομή που διαρκεί 20 λεπτά.

Ο Μάλις αρεσκόταν να κολυμπά αντίθετα στο ρεύμα, μολονότι στην προσωπική του ζωή ήταν ένας φανατικός σέρφερ που καβαλούσε ασταμάτητα τα μεγάλα κύματα. Ήταν αθυρόστομος, αμετροεπής κι εξέφραζε πάντοτε την πίστη του στην Αστρολογία.

Αμφισβητούσε πολλές επιστημονικές θεωρίες, βασιζόμενος στην πεποίθησή του πως «η επιστήμη παράγεται από ανθρώπους που είναι εξαρτημένοι από τις επιδοτήσεις για αυτά που "πρόκειται" να βρουν κι όχι για όσα πραγματικά παράγουν». Για τον λόγο αυτό θεωρούσε πως η θεωρία για τον ιό του AIDS είναι στην ουσία μία συνδυασμένη συνωμοσία περιβαλλοντολόγων, κυβερνήσεων κι επιστημόνων που δεν θέλουν να χάσουν τις καριέρες και τα λεφτά τους, αντί να παράξουν επιστημονικά δεδομένα. Την ίδια αντιμετώπιση επιφύλασσε και για τις θεωρίες για την τρύπα του όζοντος και την κλιματική αλλαγή.

Το 1992, ο Μάλις ίδρυσε μία εταιρεία για να πωλεί κοσμήματα που θα περιέχουν αντίτυπα του DNA από διάσημες νεκρές προσωπικότητες, όπως ο Έλβις Πρίσλεϊ, ή η Μέριλυν Μονρόε.

Επίσης το 1992 ίδρυσε την Atomic Tags για την ανάπτυξη κωδικοποιημένων πολύπλοκων αντισωμάτων με τη χρήση μικροσκοπίας ατομικής δύναμης.

Ο Μάλις παντρεύτηκε τέσσερις φορές, απέκτησε τρία παιδιά και είχε δύο εγγόνια.

Πηγη: sofokleousin

και San Francisco Chronicle  

Καποιοι μιλανε για "δολοφονια χαρακτηρα" απο τα ΜΜΕ, διοτι εναντιωθηκε εως και στην παγκοσμια επιστημονικη κοινοτητα, στο CDC, εναντιον της "κλιματικης αλλαγης" αλλα μιλησε και για το Aids λεγοντας πως βολευει καποιους οι οποιοι δεν γουσταρουν τους ομοφιλοφυλους... 

PCR TEST INVENTOR Kary Banks Mullis opinion on DR. FAUCI, CDC

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MkqQIY7J0fQ

Ειχε πεθανει τo Αυγουστου 2019,  λιγους μηνες πριν τα πρωτα κρυσματα της "πανδημιας" το Νoεμβρη 2019 στο Wuhan... Ειχε πεθανει λογου πνευμονιας, τοτε που μια απλη πνευμονια μπορουσε να σκοτωσει κοσμο ακομα... Ποσα θα ειχε πει σημερα;

"Αρα η πολιτικη καταπατα την επιστημη;" αρθρο για την αποφαση της διευθυντριας του CDC να επιβαλλει τον εμβολιασμο σε εγαζομενους πανω απο 18 χρονων εναντιον της γνωματευσης του FDA

 

Conformément aux recommandations formulées plus tôt dans la journée de jeudi par le groupe consultatif scientifique des CDC (ACIP), les CDC ont approuvé les doses de rappel du vaccin contre le COVID pour les Américains âgés de 65 ans et plus, les résidents de maisons de retraite et les adultes âgés de 18 à 64 ans présentant des problèmes de santé sous-jacents.

Mais cela n’a pas suffi, apparemment, pour les CDC eux-mêmes, qui sont beaucoup plus contrôlés politiquement, puisque tard hier soir, Rochelle Walensky, directrice des CDC, est allée au-delà de la recommandation de l’ACIP en demandant instamment des doses de rappel pour les personnes prétendument à haut risque en raison de leur travail – ce qui n’a pas été défini du tout (nous attendons avec impatience les querelles syndicales pour savoir quels emplois sont « à risque »).

Il est à noter que le groupe consultatif des CDC, composé d’experts médicaux indépendants, a rompu avec la FDA sur cette recommandation dans une décision partagée jeudi.

Le panel a notamment déclaré qu’il craignait que cette décision n’envoie des messages contradictoires sur les vaccins, qui sont incroyablement efficaces pour prévenir les maladies graves.

Mais, quelques heures après que le panel a voté à 9 contre 6 pour ne pas recommander de doses de rappel pour ces groupes, Walensky les a annulés.

« En tant que directrice des CDC, c’est mon travail de reconnaître où nos actions peuvent avoir le plus grand impact », a déclaré Walensky dans un communiqué jeudi soir, selon l’Associated Press.

« Aux CDC, nous sommes chargés d’analyser des données complexes, souvent imparfaites, pour formuler des recommandations concrètes qui optimisent la santé. »

Walensky a noté que sa recommandation était alignée sur celle de la Food and Drug Administration, qui a recommandé mercredi que les adultes « dans un cadre professionnel ou institutionnel » qui augmente leur risque de contracter le COVID-19 soient également éligibles pour la vaccination.

« En cas de pandémie, même dans l’incertitude, nous devons prendre les mesures qui, selon nous, seront les plus efficaces », a-t-elle déclaré dans un communiqué.

« Je pense que nous pouvons répondre au mieux aux besoins de la nation en matière de santé publique en fournissant des doses de rappel aux personnes âgées, aux personnes vivant dans des établissements de soins de longue durée, aux personnes souffrant d’affections sous-jacentes et aux adultes présentant un risque élevé de maladie en raison d’expositions professionnelles et institutionnelles au COVID-19« , a-t-elle ajouté.

Mais, comme le note Zachary Stieber de The Epoch Times, beaucoup ont déclaré qu’il n’y avait pas suffisamment de données pour étayer la recommandation et que celle-ci était si large qu’elle pourrait aussi bien s’appliquer à toute personne de 18 ans ou plus.

« Nous pourrions tout aussi bien le donner à tout le monde à partir de 18 ans. Nous avons un vaccin vraiment efficace. Et [la quatrième recommandation revient à] dire qu’il ne fonctionne pas. Or, il fonctionne« , a déclaré le Dr Pablo Sanchez, professeur de pédiatrie à l’Ohio State University/Nationwide Children’s Hospital, exprimant son désaccord au cours de la réunion.

« Je pense vraiment que c’est une solution qui cherche un problème », a ajouté plus tard le Dr Jason Goldman, professeur adjoint en Floride qui représentait l’American College of Physicians en tant qu’agent de liaison avec le groupe.

Il a déclaré que la recommandation était « très éloignée des données ».

Bien sûr, étant donné la nature indéfinie de l’emploi « à haut risque », cette décision de Walensky ouvre la porte – tout comme l’ACIP l’avait prévenu – à tout le monde pour faire valoir qu’ils méritent une 3ème (4ème ou 5ème…) dose de rappel et ouvre également la porte à l’activation de la « dose annuelle de COVID » que les grands CEOS (plus récemment le PDG de Moderna) ont suggéré.

Pour rappel, ces décisions interviennent peu de temps après que deux éminents scientifiques de la FDA ont présenté leur démission en guise de protestation contre l’annonce préventive des responsables fédéraux de la santé.

Ces responsables, Marion Gruber et Phil Krause, ont ensuite écrit un article dans une revue médicale affirmant que rien ne prouve que la population générale devrait recevoir des doses de rappel, et la FDA a signalé séparément que les vaccins de rappel n’étaient peut-être pas nécessaires.

Alors, est-ce que la « politique » a pris le dessus sur la « science » ?

Telegram 

Πηγη: εδω https://www.aubedigitale.com/la-directrice-des-cdc-rejette-la-decision-du-comite-consultatif-scientifique-et-approuve-les-vaccins-de-rappel-pour-les-travailleurs-a-haut-risque/?__cf_chl_captcha_tk__=pmd_8PmNmOB5OXvJDqVSF5vYD.QzfUIxZagWFCok6O_mLmQ-1632661277-0-gqNtZGzNA2WjcnBszQ0R

 

Μολις βρηκα ενα παλιο αρθρο του 2014 απο iefimerida με τιτλο: "Αντιγριπικό εμβόλιο σκόρπισε τον θάνατο στην Ιταλία: Στους 13 οι νεκροί". Και μια συγκριση με την ερευνα των αρχων σημερα...

NEWSROOM IEFIMERIDA.GR
01/12/2014  10:07<p>Πηγή: <a target="_blank" href="https://www.iefimerida.gr">iefimerida.gr</a> - <a target="_blank" href="https://www.iefimerida.gr/news/180693/antigripiko-emvolio-skorpise-ton-thanato-stin-italia-stoys-13-oi-nekroi">Αντιγριπικό εμβόλιο σκόρπισε τον θάνατο στην Ιταλία: Στους 13 οι νεκροί </a></p>

Συναγερμός έχει σημάνει στις υγειονομικές αρχές της Ιταλίας, καθώς ο αριθμός των ανθρώπων που πέθαναν στη χώρα έπειτα από τη χορήγηση αντιγριπικού εμβολίου ανήλθε σε 13, ανακοίνωσαν αργά το βράδυ της Κυριακής οι αρμόδιες Αρχές.

Αρχικά, οι θάνατοι ηλικιωμένων λίγες ημέρες μετά τον εμβολιασμό τους από τη φαρμακευτική εταιρεία Novartis σύμφωνα με τον Τύπο, ήταν τέσσερις. Σε διάστημα τεσσάρων ημερών όμως αυξήθηκαν σε 13.

Πρόκειται για άτομα άνω των 65 ετών και δεν έχει ακόμη εξακριβωθεί αν υπάρχει, πράγματι, ουσιαστική σχέση ανάμεσα στους θανάτους αυτούς και στο εμβόλιο Fluad, σύμφωνα με τον Εθνικό Οργανισμό Φαρμάκων της Ιταλίας (AIFA), ο οποίος κάλεσε επίσης τους πολίτες να μην πανικοβάλλονται. Για την ολοκλήρωση των εργαστηριακών εξετάσεων θα χρειασθούν περίπου τέσσερις εβδομάδες.

Επισήμανε ακόμη ότι απαγόρευσε προληπτικά την διάθεση δύο παρτίδων του εμβολίου FLUAD μέχρι να ολοκληρωθούν οι έρευνες που βρίσκονται σε εξέλιξη.

Ο AIFA ανακοίνωσε ότι ο Ευρωπαϊκός Οργανισμός Φαρμάκων θα ξεκινήσει να εξετάζει την κατάσταση αύριο Δευτέρα και την Πέμπτη θα προβεί σε ανακοινώσεις. Την περασμένη Πέμπτη, οι ιταλικές Αρχές επέβαλαν μερική απαγόρευση του FLUAD έπειτα από την πληροφορία ότι τρεις άνθρωποι πέθαναν και ένας ακόμη νοσηλευόταν σε κρίσιμη κατάσταση μέσα σε ένα 48ωρο από τη χορήγηση του εμβολίου. Μέσα στις επόμενες μέρες έγιναν γνωστά περισσότερα τέτοια κρούσματα.

Η εισαγγελία της Σιένα ξεκίνησε έρευνα σχετικά με ενδεχόμενη παραγωγή επιζήμιων φαρμακευτικών σκευασμάτων, ενώ οι εισαγγελίες της Ρώμης, του Πράτο και των Συρακουσών στη Σικελία θα ερευνήσουν επίσης τις υποθέσεις των ύποπτων θανάτων.

Από την μεριά της, η φαρμακευτική εταιρία Novartis τονίζει ότι τα προϊόντα της είναι ασφαλή και ότι στην Ευρώπη έχουν διατεθεί εκατομμύρια εμβόλια Fluad, χωρίς να έχουν προκύψει προβλήματα.

Το εμβόλιο έχει διατεθεί συνολικά σε νοσοκομεία και κέντρα υγείας δώδεκα ιταλικών περιφερειών. Η εταιρία Novartis έχει εξασφαλίσει άδεια από τις ιταλικές αρχές για την παραγωγή και διάθεση τεσσάρων εκατομμυρίων δόσεων αντιγριπικών εμβολίων.

Σημειώνεται ότι το εν λόγω εμβόλιο δεν κυκλοφορεί στην Ελλάδα.

 <p>Πηγή: <a target="_blank" href="https://www.iefimerida.gr">iefimerida.gr</a> - <a target="_blank" href="https://www.iefimerida.gr/news/180693/antigripiko-emvolio-skorpise-ton-thanato-stin-italia-stoys-13-oi-nekroi">Αντιγριπικό εμβόλιο σκόρπισε τον θάνατο στην Ιταλία: Στους 13 οι νεκροί </a></p>

Πηγη: iefimerida 

https://www.iefimerida.gr/news/180693/antigripiko-emvolio-skorpise-ton-thanato-stin-italia-stoys-13-oi-nekroi 

Τοτε που οι εισαγγελικες αρχες ερευνουσαν τους υποπτους θανατους "έρευνα σχετικά με ενδεχόμενη παραγωγή επιζήμιων φαρμακευτικών σκευασμάτων" 

Και δεν ερευνουσαν αυτους που δημοσιευαν την ειδηση...

Οπως και τοτε που ο Ευρωπαϊκός Οργανισμός Φαρμάκων ξεκινουσε ερευνα το 2014 για θανατους των 3 ανθρωπων και μια παρενεργια μεσα σε δυο μερες σε μια χωρα μελους, ενω τωρα Σεπτεμβριο2021 οταν πεθαναν στην Ευρωπη καπου 25 000 και καταγγραφονται πανω απο 2 300 000 σοβαρες παρενεργειες αναμεσα σε 27 χωρες της Ε.Ε., μονο κανει μια ανακοινωση περι "καταγγεγραμενων θανατων και παρενεργειων...  δηλαδη καπου 4.4 θανατοι και 130 σοβαρες παρενεργειες καταγγεγραγμενες την ημερα σε καθε χωρα της ΕΕ και ΚΑΝΕΙΣ ΔΕΝ ΕΡΕΥΝΑ; 

(Η ακομα παραπανω πιθανον μπορει να καταγγραφονται μονο σε χωρες οπου συνεχιζεται ΥΠΟΧΡΕΩΤΙΚΑ  η αυξηση των εμβολιασμων, διοτι πχ. χωρες οπως η Ρουμανια δεν επιβαλλει τον μαζικο εμβολιασμο το οποιο εφτασε στο 28% (προς τιμην της!)...)

Πως φτανουμε ομως σε αυτους τους αριθμους... στην συνεχεια:

Για να δουμε μια αναφορα θανατων απο την EudraVigilance απο τις αρχες Ιουλιου 2021

by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News

The European Union database of suspected drug reaction reports is EudraVigilance, which also tracks reports of injuries and deaths following the experimental COVID-19 “vaccines.”

A Health Impact News subscriber from Europe reminded us that this database maintained at EudraVigilance is only for countries in Europe who are part of the European Union (EU), which comprises 27 countries.

The total number of countries in Europe is much higher, almost twice as many, numbering around 50. (There are some differences of opinion as to which countries are technically part of Europe.)

So as high as these numbers are, they do NOT reflect all of Europe. The actual number in Europe who are reported dead or injured due to COVID-19 shots would be much higher than what we are reporting here.

The EudraVigilance database reports that through July 3, 2021 there are 17,503 deaths and 1,687,527 injuries reported following injections of four experimental COVID-19 shots:

• COVID-19 MRNA VACCINE MODERNA (CX-024414)
• COVID-19 MRNA VACCINE PFIZER-BIONTECH
• COVID-19 VACCINE ASTRAZENECA (CHADOX1 NCOV-19)
• COVID-19 VACCINE JANSSEN (AD26.COV2.S)

From the total of injuries recorded, half of them (837,588 ) are serious injuries.

“Seriousness provides information on the suspected undesirable effect; it can be classified as ‘serious’ if it corresponds to a medical occurrence that results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalisation, results in another medically important condition, or prolongation of existing hospitalisation, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect.”

As we reported yesterday, tens of thousands of people in the U.S. now regret getting the COVID-19 shots, and are begging for help, because the medical system has turned its back on them and refuses to treat their injuries. See:

Tens of Thousands of COVID-19 “Vaccine” Injured in the U.S. Begging for Help as the Medical Community Turns Their Back on Them

One subscriber from the UK commented on the article and stated that the same thing was happening there:

It is exactly the same in Scotland and England.

My vaccinated friends are not getting appointments with their family doctors who are avoiding them post vaccination even although there are no patients in the GP surgery waiting rooms when they have tried to get appointments. It is utterly cruel given they talked them into getting the vaccinations and accepted 10 UK pounds from the Scottish and English governments per person vaccinated on their patient list and did not disclose the risk of these vaccinations to the patients.

A friend nearly passed out close to the GP surgery, a kind stranger wheeled her up to the GP surgery and she was not allowed to be seen by her GP because she did not have an appointment. The nurse refused to take bloods because they are not allowed to do so until management confirms they can do this so they cannot even do exploratory bloods to investigate what has gone wrong with these patients post vaccination.

Another friend’s hospital consultant phoned a friend’s GP insisting her family doctor see her given she had had heart procedures and no appointments for 2 years. She told me after first Pfizer shot “it was like acid going into my veins” and the queen did not get the same vaccine asshe did which will be completely true. Her GP treated her with disdain and was not pleased to see her and my friend also tells me that every time she walks now post vaccination her heart races and her son has been unwell post vaccination too.

All my friends who got the vaccination have had severe worsening of their pre-existing medical conditions and some have got heart conditions they did not previously have or chronic obstructive airways disease.

I have noticed most have became irritable and short-tempered as they are becoming unwell not realising the vaccine is harming them and they are lashing out at others for no good reason.

In UK, NHS contributions are deducted from people’s salaries and the retired paid these all their working life and now are getting refused service but they will still take these NHS contributions regardless. It is wicked and cruel. Though it is the governments who are instructing the GP and hospital management to treat the patients in this abysmal manner.

I am quite sure this will be happening in most if not all countries.

God be with us all.

A Health Impact News subscriber in Europe ran the reports for each of the four COVID-19 shots we are including here. This subscriber has volunteered to do this, and it is a lot of work to tabulate each reaction with injuries and fatalities, since there is no place on the EudraVigilance system we have found that tabulates all the results.

Since we have started publishing this, others from Europe have also calculated the numbers and confirmed the totals.*

Here is the summary data through July 3, 2021.

Total reactions for the experimental mRNA vaccine Tozinameran (code BNT162b2,Comirnaty) from BioNTech/ Pfizer: 8,426 deaths and 632,623 injuries to 03/07/2021

• 17,754   Blood and lymphatic system disorders incl. 99 deaths
• 14,858   Cardiac disorders incl. 1,165 deaths
• 126        Congenital, familial and genetic disorders incl. 12 deaths
• 7,951     Ear and labyrinth disorders incl. 5 deaths
• 324        Endocrine disorders incl. 2 deaths
• 9,319     Eye disorders incl. 19 deaths
• 57,599   Gastrointestinal disorders incl. 388 deaths
• 173,572 General disorders and administration site conditions incl. 2,510 deaths
• 558        Hepatobiliary disorders incl. 33 deaths
• 6,948     Immune system disorders incl. 42 deaths
• 19,780   Infections and infestations incl. 834 deaths
• 7,204     Injury, poisoning and procedural complications incl. 124 deaths
• 15,281   Investigations incl. 296 deaths
• 4,721     Metabolism and nutrition disorders incl. 164 deaths
• 88,638   Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders incl. 103 deaths
• 386        Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl. cysts and polyps) incl. 26 deaths
• 114,125 Nervous system disorders incl. 902 deaths
• 478        Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions incl. 18 deaths
• 124        Product issues
• 11,148   Psychiatric disorders incl. 117 deaths
• 2,005     Renal and urinary disorders incl. 132 deaths
• 3,597     Reproductive system and breast disorders incl. 2 deaths
• 27,121   Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders incl. 989 deaths
• 30,404   Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders incl. 79 deaths
• 979        Social circumstances incl. 12 deaths
• 392        Surgical and medical procedures incl. 21 deaths
• 17,231   Vascular disorders incl. 332 deaths

Total reactions for the experimental mRNA vaccine mRNA-1273(CX-024414) from Moderna: 4,605 deaths and 157,802 injuries to 03/07/2021

• 2,890     Blood and lymphatic system disorders incl. 35 deaths
• 4,491     Cardiac disorders incl. 503 deaths
• 66           Congenital, familial and genetic disorders incl. 4 deaths
• 1,972     Ear and labyrinth disorders
• 110        Endocrine disorders incl. 1 death
• 2,498     Eye disorders incl. 9 deaths
• 13,626   Gastrointestinal disorders incl. 161 deaths
• 42,716   General disorders and administration site conditions incl. 1,928 deaths
• 269        Hepatobiliary disorders incl. 17 deaths
• 1,349     Immune system disorders incl. 5 deaths
• 4,793     Infections and infestations incl. 259 deaths
• 3,378     Injury, poisoning and procedural complications incl. 92 deaths
• 3,359     Investigations incl. 93 deaths
• 1,616     Metabolism and nutrition disorders incl. 94 deaths
• 19,416   Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders incl. 88 deaths
• 175        Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl. cysts and polyps) incl. 18 deaths
• 28,239   Nervous system disorders incl. 465 deaths
• 338        Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions incl. 2 deaths
• 24           Product issues
• 3,193     Psychiatric disorders incl. 75 deaths
• 1,061     Renal and urinary disorders incl. 66 deaths
• 723        Reproductive system and breast disorders incl. 2 death
• 7,268     Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders incl. 438 deaths
• 8,400     Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders incl. 32 deaths
• 690        Social circumstances incl. 16 deaths
• 540        Surgical and medical procedures incl. 42 deaths
• 4,602     Vascular disorders incl. 160 deaths

Total reactions for the experimental vaccine AZD1222/VAXZEVRIA (CHADOX1 NCOV-19) from Oxford/ AstraZeneca: 3,871 deaths and 852,616 injuries to 03/07/2021

• 9,950     Blood and lymphatic system disorders incl. 160 deaths
• 13,336   Cardiac disorders incl. 454 deaths
• 115        Congenital, familial and genetic disorders incl. 3 deaths
• 9,712     Ear and labyrinth disorders
• 355        Endocrine disorders incl. 3 deaths
• 14,641   Eye disorders incl. 15 deaths
• 86,515   Gastrointestinal disorders incl. 184 deaths
• 227,408 General disorders and administration site conditions incl. 1,009 deaths
• 607        Hepatobiliary disorders incl. 32 deaths
• 3,359     Immune system disorders incl. 14 deaths
• 19,508   Infections and infestations incl. 247 deaths
• 8,912     Injury, poisoning and procedural complications incl. 94 deaths
• 18,352   Investigations incl. 88 deaths
• 10,315   Metabolism and nutrition disorders incl. 50 deaths
• 131,547 Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders incl. 50 deaths
• 379        Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl. cysts and polyps) incl. 9 deaths
• 180,575 Nervous system disorders incl. 612 deaths
• 279        Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions incl. 5 deaths
• 117        Product issues
• 16,000   Psychiatric disorders incl. 33 deaths
• 3,045     Renal and urinary disorders incl. 33 deaths
• 8,593     Reproductive system and breast disorders
• 28,994   Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders incl. 447 deaths
• 39,173   Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders incl. 25 deaths
• 866        Social circumstances incl. 5 deaths
• 754        Surgical and medical procedures incl. 16 deaths
• 19,209   Vascular disorders incl. 283 deaths

Total reactions for the experimental COVID-19 vaccine JANSSEN (AD26.COV2.S) from Johnson & Johnson: 601 deaths and 44,486 injuries to 03/07/2021

• 405        Blood and lymphatic system disorders incl. 18 deaths
• 659        Cardiac disorders incl. 73 deaths
• 16           Congenital, familial and genetic disorders
• 250        Ear and labyrinth disorders
• 10           Endocrine disorders incl. 1 death
• 518        Eye disorders incl. 3 deaths
• 4,283     Gastrointestinal disorders incl. 25 deaths
• 11,832   General disorders and administration site conditions incl. 150 deaths
• 58           Hepatobiliary disorders incl. 4 deaths
• 161        Immune system disorders incl. 1 death
• 598        Infections and infestations incl. 16 deaths
• 413        Injury, poisoning and procedural complications incl. 8 deaths
• 2,420     Investigations incl. 39 deaths
• 225        Metabolism and nutrition disorders incl. 11 deaths
• 7,687     Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders incl. 17 deaths
• 18           Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl. cysts and polyps)
• 9,547     Nervous system disorders incl. 76 deaths
• 15           Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions incl. 1 death
• 11           Product issues
• 459        Psychiatric disorders incl. 5 deaths
• 150        Renal and urinary disorders incl. 8 deaths
• 166        Reproductive system and breast disorders incl. 1 death
• 1,453     Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders incl. 47 deaths
• 1,125     Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders incl. 2 deaths
• 91           Social circumstances incl. 3 deaths
• 393        Surgical and medical procedures incl. 27 deaths
• 1,523     Vascular disorders incl. 65 deaths

*These totals are estimates based on reports submitted to EudraVigilance. Totals may be much higher based on percentage of adverse reactions that are reported. Some of these reports may also be reported to the individual country’s adverse reaction databases, such as the U.S. VAERS database and the UK Yellow Card system. The fatalities are grouped by symptoms, and some fatalities may have resulted from multiple symptoms.

Πηγη: εδω 

https://vaccineimpact.com/2021/17503-dead-1-7-million-injured-50-serious-reported-in-european-unions-database-of-adverse-drug-reactions-for-covid-19-shots/ 

Οπως και μια αναφορα θανατων και σοβαρων παρενεργειων στην Ευρωπη στις αρχες Σεπτεμβριου 2021 :

September 14, 2021

 Print This Post

24,526 Deaths 2,317,495 Injuries Following COVID Shots Reported in European Union’s Database of Adverse Drug Reactions

by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News

The European Union database of suspected drug reaction reports is EudraVigilance, and they are now reporting 24,526 fatalities, and 2,317,495 injuries, following COVID-19 injections.

A Health Impact News subscriber from Europe reminded us that this database maintained at EudraVigilance is only for countries in Europe who are part of the European Union (EU), which comprises 27 countries.

The total number of countries in Europe is much higher, almost twice as many, numbering around 50. (There are some differences of opinion as to which countries are technically part of Europe.)

So as high as these numbers are, they do NOT reflect all of Europe. The actual number in Europe who are reported dead or injured following COVID-19 shots would be much higher than what we are reporting here.

The EudraVigilance database reports that through September 11, 2021 there are 24,526 deaths and 2,317,495 injuries reported following injections of four experimental COVID-19 shots:

• COVID-19 MRNA VACCINE MODERNA (CX-024414)
• COVID-19 MRNA VACCINE PFIZER-BIONTECH
• COVID-19 VACCINE ASTRAZENECA (CHADOX1 NCOV-19)
• COVID-19 VACCINE JANSSEN (AD26.COV2.S)

From the total of injuries recorded, almost half of them (1,126,869) are serious injuries.

“Seriousness provides information on the suspected undesirable effect; it can be classified as ‘serious’ if it corresponds to a medical occurrence that results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalisation, results in another medically important condition, or prolongation of existing hospitalisation, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect.”

A Health Impact News subscriber in Europe ran the reports for each of the four COVID-19 shots we are including here. It is a lot of work to tabulate each reaction with injuries and fatalities, since there is no place on the EudraVigilance system we have found that tabulates all the results.

Since we have started publishing this, others from Europe have also calculated the numbers and confirmed the totals.*

Here is the summary data through September 11, 2021.

Σ

Total reactions for the mRNA vaccine Tozinameran (code BNT162b2,Comirnaty) from BioNTech/ Pfizer – 11,711 deaths and 980,474 injuries to 11/09/2021

• 26,634   Blood and lymphatic system disorders incl. 156 deaths
• 26,940   Cardiac disorders incl. 1,745 deaths
• 253        Congenital, familial and genetic disorders incl. 21 deaths
• 13,005   Ear and labyrinth disorders incl. 9 deaths
• 728        Endocrine disorders incl. 5 deaths
• 15,314   Eye disorders incl. 28 deaths
• 87,239   Gastrointestinal disorders incl. 489 deaths
• 256,117 General disorders and administration site conditions incl. 3,330 deaths
• 1,098     Hepatobiliary disorders incl. 55 deaths
• 10,351   Immune system disorders incl. 64 deaths
• 32,834   Infections and infestations incl. 1,141 deaths
• 12,714   Injury, poisoning and procedural complications incl. 179 deaths
• 24,765   Investigations incl. 368 deaths
• 7,178     Metabolism and nutrition disorders incl. 210 deaths
• 130,077 Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders incl. 149 deaths
• 757        Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) incl. 67 deaths
• 173,079 Nervous system disorders incl. 1,278 deaths
• 1,211     Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions incl. 36 deaths
• 168        Product issues incl. 1 death
• 17,756   Psychiatric disorders incl. 156 deaths
• 3,348     Renal and urinary disorders incl. 198 deaths
• 19,084   Reproductive system and breast disorders incl. 3 deaths
• 43,232   Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders incl. 1,376 deaths
• 47,012   Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders incl. 105 deaths
• 1,805     Social circumstances incl. 14 deaths
• 887        Surgical and medical procedures incl. 31 deaths
• 26,888   Vascular disorders incl. 497 deaths

Total reactions for the mRNA vaccine mRNA-1273 (CX-024414) from Moderna – 6,358 deaths and 281,505 injuries to 11/09/2021

• 5,465     Blood and lymphatic system disorders incl. 59 deaths
• 8,364     Cardiac disorders incl. 687 deaths
• 113        Congenital, familial and genetic disorders incl. 2 deaths
• 3,466     Ear and labyrinth disorders incl. 1 death
• 221        Endocrine disorders incl. 2 deaths
• 4,302     Eye disorders incl. 18 deaths
• 24,595   Gastrointestinal disorders incl. 237 deaths
• 75,804   General disorders and administration site conditions incl. 2,461 deaths
• 458        Hepatobiliary disorders incl. 24 deaths
• 2,485     Immune system disorders incl. 11 deaths
• 8,436     Infections and infestations incl. 416 deaths
• 6,013     Injury, poisoning and procedural complications incl. 121 deaths
• 5,460     Investigations incl. 120 deaths
• 2,693     Metabolism and nutrition disorders incl. 145 deaths
• 35,728   Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders incl. 129 deaths
• 333        Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) incl. 37 deaths
• 49,722   Nervous system disorders incl. 650 deaths
• 538        Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions incl. 6 deaths
• 59           Product issues incl. 1 death
• 5,316     Psychiatric disorders incl. 110 deaths
• 1,632     Renal and urinary disorders incl. 107 deaths
• 3,558     Reproductive system and breast disorders incl. 3 deaths
• 12,150   Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders incl. 614 deaths
• 15,102   Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders incl. 57 deaths
• 1,188     Social circumstances incl. 25 deaths
• 905        Surgical and medical procedures incl. 69 deaths
• 7,399     Vascular disorders incl. 246 deaths

Total reactions for the vaccine AZD1222/VAXZEVRIA (CHADOX1 NCOV-19) from Oxford/ AstraZeneca: 5,254 deaths and 980,909 injuries to 11/09/2021

• 11,826   Blood and lymphatic system disorders incl. 221 deaths
• 16,641   Cardiac disorders incl. 603 deaths
• 158        Congenital familial and genetic disorders incl. 5 deaths
• 11,541   Ear and labyrinth disorders incl. 1 death
• 504        Endocrine disorders incl. 4 deaths
• 17,332   Eye disorders incl. 22 deaths
• 96,191   Gastrointestinal disorders incl. 270 deaths
• 257,766 General disorders and administration site conditions incl. 1,278 deaths
• 831        Hepatobiliary disorders incl. 51 deaths
• 3,987     Immune system disorders incl. 23 deaths
• 24,674   Infections and infestations incl. 330 deaths
• 11,183   Injury poisoning and procedural complications incl. 141 deaths
• 21,578   Investigations incl. 121 deaths
• 11,626   Metabolism and nutrition disorders incl. 73 deaths
• 148,195 Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders incl. 74 deaths
• 510        Neoplasms benign malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) incl. 16 deaths
• 204,423 Nervous system disorders incl. 840 deaths
• 439        Pregnancy puerperium and perinatal conditions incl. 11 deaths
• 158        Product issues incl. 1 death
• 18,501   Psychiatric disorders incl. 47 deaths
• 3,639     Renal and urinary disorders incl. 48 deaths
• 12,993   Reproductive system and breast disorders incl. 2 deaths
• 34,557   Respiratory thoracic and mediastinal disorders incl. 629 deaths
• 45,140   Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders incl. 36 deaths
• 1,291     Social circumstances incl. 6 deaths
• 1,142     Surgical and medical procedures incl. 22 deaths
• 24,083   Vascular disorders incl. 379 deaths

Total reactions for the COVID-19 vaccine JANSSEN (AD26.COV2.S) from Johnson & Johnson: 1,203 deaths and 74,607 injuries to 11/09/2021

• 690        Blood and lymphatic system disorders incl. 31 deaths
• 1,201     Cardiac disorders incl. 120 deaths
• 25           Congenital, familial and genetic disorders
• 560        Ear and labyrinth disorders incl. 1 death
• 42           Endocrine disorders incl. 1 death
• 1,006     Eye disorders incl. 5 deaths
• 6,822     Gastrointestinal disorders incl. 56 deaths
• 19,539   General disorders and administration site conditions incl. 303 deaths
• 96           Hepatobiliary disorders incl. 9 deaths
• 302        Immune system disorders incl. 7 deaths
• 1,679     Infections and infestations incl. 66 deaths
• 694        Injury, poisoning and procedural complications incl. 16 deaths
• 3,861     Investigations incl. 72 deaths
• 431        Metabolism and nutrition disorders incl. 26 deaths
• 11,861   Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders incl. 30 deaths
• 31           Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) incl. 2 deaths
• 15,493   Nervous system disorders incl. 142 deaths
• 26           Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions incl. 1 death
• 20           Product issues
• 988        Psychiatric disorders incl. 11 deaths
• 280        Renal and urinary disorders incl. 11 deaths
• 863        Reproductive system and breast disorders incl. 4 deaths
• 2,629     Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders incl. 136 deaths
• 2,296     Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders incl. 5 deaths
• 212        Social circumstances incl. 4 deaths
• 546        Surgical and medical procedures incl. 38 deaths
• 2,414     Vascular disorders incl. 106 deaths

Πηγη: εδω

https://healthimpactnews.com/2021/24526-deaths-2317495-injuries-following-covid-shots-reported-in-european-unions-database-of-adverse-drug-reactions/ 

Συμπερασμα μου: Αφου σε δυο μηνες η διαφορα θανατων ειναι καπου 7000 θανατοι, αυτο μας δινει πως σε ενα μηνα πεθαινουν μετα εμβολιασμων 3500 μονο στις 27 χωρες της Ευρωπαικης Ενωσης, δηλαδη καπου 130 θανατους ΚΑΤΑΓΓΕΓΡΑΜΕΝΟΥΣ σε καθε χωρα απο τις 27 ΣΕ ΕΝΑ ΜΗΝΑ ΜΟΝΟ... Και ΚΑΝΕΙΣ ΔΕΝ ΕΡΕΥΝΑ ΤΗΝ "επιζημιωγονα δραση φαρμακευτικων ειδων";;;; Δηλαδη ΚΑΤΑΓΡΑΦΕΤΑΙ πως καπου 4 και ανω ανθρωποι πεθαινουν ΚΑΘΕ ΜΕΡΑ ΣΕ ΚΑΘΕ ΜΙΑ ΑΠΟ ΤΙΣ 27 ΧΩΡΕΣ της Ε.Ε. μετα τον εμβολιασμο κατα κορονοιου και ΚΑΝΕΙΣ ΔΕΝ ΕΡΕΥΝΑ;;;; 

Οταν μαλιστα εχουμε και καπου 300 000 ΣΟΒΑΡΕΣ ΠΑΡΕΝΕΡΓΕΙΕΣ ΚΑΤΑΓΓΕΓΡΑΓΜΕΝΕΣ ΤΟ ΜΗΝΑ ΣΤΗΝ ΕΕ...δηλαδη καπου 11 111 ΣΟΒΑΡΕΣ παρενεργειες για ΚΑΘΕ ΧΩΡΑ απο τις 27 το μηνα...  δηλαδη καπου 130 σοβαρες παρενεργεις ΚΑΘΕ ΜΕΡΑ εκτος απο 4,5 θανατους καθε μερα σε καθε χωρα της Ε.Ε. και ΚΑΝΕΙΣ ΔΕΝ ΕΡΕΥΝΑ;;;;

Επιπλεον, οταν η ιδια η Ε.Ε. επεβαλλε τον Κανονισμο της ωστε να ΜΗΝ υπαρχει υποχρεωτικοτητα εμβολιασμου ουτε επιπτωσεις εναντιον των ευρωπαιων πολιτων η που διαμενουν στην Ευρωπη και δεν θελουν να εμβολιαστουν, ΔΕΝ ΕΡΕΥΝΑΤΑΙ ΠΩΣ ΚΡΑΤΗ ΜΕΛΗ ΚΑΤΑΠΑΤΑΝ ΤΟΝ ΕΥΡΩΠΑΙΚΟ ΚΑΝΟΝΙΣΜΟ ΜΑΖΙ ΜΕ ΤΑ ΑΝΘΡΩΠΙΝΑ ΔΙΚΑΙΩΜΑΤΑ ΚΑΙ ΔΙΕΘΝΕΙΣ ΣΥΜΒΑΣΕΙΣ;;;; 

Ειδικα οταν καταγγραφονται ενα ΤΕΡΑΣΤΙΟ ΑΡΙΘΜΟ ΘΑΝΑΤΩΝ ΚΑΙ ΣΟΒΑΡΩΝ ΠΑΡΕΝΕΡΓΕΙΩΝ ΚΑΘΕ ΜΕΡΑ... 

ΤΙ ΓΙΝΕΤΑΙ ΕΔΩ;

Ποιος Νοστράδαμος… ο Μπους το 2005 τα είχε πει όλα!

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gt-C73tXsAc

Πηγη: youtube

Stefanos Damianidis

50 χιλ. εγγεγραμμένοι

Δημήτρης Γάκης: 251 φορές υψηλότερο ιϊκό φορτίο οι εμβολιασμένοι, αν νοσήσουν (μελέτη Οξφόρδης). Και η μελετη οπως δημοσιευτηκε στο ιατρικο περιοδικο Lancet

 

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nqR87XRojfU

Neocleous youtube

Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 Delta Variant Among Vaccinated Healthcare Workers, Vietnam

31 Pages Posted: 10 Aug 2021

Nguyen Van Vinh Chau

Hospital for Tropical Diseases

Nghiem My Ngoc

Hospital for Tropical Diseases

Lam Anh Nguyet

Hospital of Tropical Diseases - Oxford University Clinical Research Unit

Vo Minh Quang

Hospital for Tropical Diseases

Nguyen Thi Han Ny

Hospital of Tropical Diseases - Oxford University Clinical Research Unit

Dao Bach Khoa

Hospital for Tropical Diseases

Nguyen Thanh Phong

Hospital for Tropical Diseases

Le Mau Toan

Hospital for Tropical Diseases

Nguyen Thi Thu Hong

Hospital of Tropical Diseases - Oxford University Clinical Research Unit

Nguyen Thi Kim Tuyen

Hospital of Tropical Diseases - Oxford University Clinical Research Unit

Voong Vinh Phat

Hospital of Tropical Diseases - Oxford University Clinical Research Unit

Le Nguyen Truc Nhu

Hospital of Tropical Diseases - Oxford University Clinical Research Unit

Nguyen Huynh Thanh Truc

Hospital for Tropical Diseases

Bui Thi Ton That

Hospital for Tropical Diseases

Huynh Phuong Thao

Hospital for Tropical Diseases

Tran Nguyen Phuong Thao

Hospital for Tropical Diseases

Vo Trong Vuong

Hospital for Tropical Diseases

Tran Thi Thanh Tam

Hospital for Tropical Diseases

Ngo Tan Tai

Hospital for Tropical Diseases

Ho The Bao

Hospital for Tropical Diseases

Huynh Thi Kim Nhung

Hospital for Tropical Diseases

Nguyen Thi Ngoc Minh

Hospital for Tropical Diseases

Nguyen Thi My Tien

Hospital for Tropical Diseases

Nguy Cam Huy

Hospital for Tropical Diseases

Marc Choisy

Hospital of Tropical Diseases - Oxford University Clinical Research Unit

Dinh Nguyen Huy Man

Hospital for Tropical Diseases

Dinh Thi Bich Ty

Hospital for Tropical Diseases

Nguyen To Anh

Hospital of Tropical Diseases - Oxford University Clinical Research Unit

Le Thi Tam Uyen

Hospital for Tropical Diseases

Tran Nguyen Hoang Tu

Hospital for Tropical Diseases

Lam Minh Yen

Hospital of Tropical Diseases - Oxford University Clinical Research Unit

Nguyen Thanh Dung

Hospital for Tropical Diseases

Le Manh Hung

Hospital for Tropical Diseases

Nguyen Thanh Truong

Hospital for Tropical Diseases

Tran Tan Thanh

Hospital of Tropical Diseases - Oxford University Clinical Research Unit

Guy Thwaites

Hospital of Tropical Diseases - Oxford University Clinical Research Unit

Le Van Tan

Hospital of Tropical Diseases - Oxford University Clinical Research Unit

OUCRU COVID-19 Research Group

Και σχολια:

• • 
    
    
    
  
  
• • 
    

  

  Dave Fort Dave Fort • 11 days ago

  First I want to say, "Sorry".

  Highlighting the lines that I wanted to quote wasn't working properly so I re-typed the sentence from lines 37 and 38. When I did this, I accidentally left off the beginning of the sentence. The full sentence is "Viral loads of breakthrough Delta variant infection cases were 251 times higher than those of cases infected with old strains detected between March-April 2020." There are other sentences that are clear about this as well, such as those in lines 213-216 and lines 291-294. Also, the key words section, on line 22, has the phrase "vaccine breakthroughs."

  For people who are confused about what "old strains detected between March-April 2020" means in the quote, lines 158-160 state, "For viral load comparison, we used previously reported data of SARS-CoV-2 infected cases detected in Vietnam during the early phase of the pandemic in Vietnam between March and April 2020."

  In other words, the viral loads were 251 times higher in vaccinated people who contracted the Delta variant than they were for unvaccinated people who contracted previous variants of the virus. However, the quote from The Defender is still incorrect because it lumps all of the variants together.

  •

  Reply

  •

  Share ›

  
  
• • 
    

  

  Randy Oveson Dave Fort • 17 days ago • edited

  In other words, vaccinated people carried 251 times more the viral load of the delta variant than those who were unvaccinated, but had natural immunity, through dealing with the old strains -- having tested positive for those older strains during March-April 2020. So, to simplify it could say: "The study found vaccinated individuals carry 251 times the load of COVID-19 viruses in their nostrils compared to the unvaccinated, who had tested positive in March-April 2020." IMO, this is more about natural immunity vs vaccinated immunity than vaccinated vs unvaccinated.

  •

  Reply

  •

  Share ›

  
  
• • −
  • 
    

  

  Susanna Viterale Cleur Dave Fort • 21 days ago

  In the abstract it speaks of the healthcare workers type of Delta strain......23 complete genome sequences were obtained.They all belonged to the Delta variant, and were phylogenetically distinct from the contemporary Delta variant sequences obtained from community transmission cases, suggestive of ongoing transmission between the workers.
  Doesn't this suggest that this variant was not like the community delta variant but in the case study it seemed that the spreading and transmission was amongst the cluster of healthcare workers alone vaxed at the same time. Suggesting a breakthrough strain coming from the hospital staff alone amongst themselves... not external transmission from other sources outside the group. Their genome sequence was the same but not like the community cases.
  ????suggestions.
  ????phylogenetically distinct
  ????delta spread amongst vaxed

  Πηγη: εδω  

  https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3897733

  Nguyen Van Vinh Chau

  Hospital for Tropical Diseases ( email )

  Ho Chi Minh City
  Vietnam
  

  Nghiem My Ngoc

  Hospital for Tropical Diseases ( email )

  Ho Chi Minh City
  Vietnam
  

  Lam Anh Nguyet

  Hospital of Tropical Diseases - Oxford University Clinical Research Unit ( email )

  Vietnam
  

  Vo Minh Quang

  Hospital for Tropical Diseases ( email )

  Ho Chi Minh City
  Vietnam
  

  Nguyen Thi Han Ny

  Hospital of Tropical Diseases - Oxford University Clinical Research Unit ( email )

  Vietnam
  

  Dao Bach Khoa

  Hospital for Tropical Diseases ( email )

  Ho Chi Minh City
  Vietnam
  

  Nguyen Thanh Phong

  Hospital for Tropical Diseases ( email )

  Ho Chi Minh City
  Vietnam
  

  Le Mau Toan

  Hospital for Tropical Diseases ( email )

  Ho Chi Minh City
  Vietnam
  

  Nguyen Thi Thu Hong

  Hospital of Tropical Diseases - Oxford University Clinical Research Unit ( email )

  Vietnam
  

  Nguyen Thi Kim Tuyen

  Hospital of Tropical Diseases - Oxford University Clinical Research Unit ( email )

  Vietnam
  

  Voong Vinh Phat

  Hospital of Tropical Diseases - Oxford University Clinical Research Unit ( email )

  Vietnam
  

  Le Nguyen Truc Nhu

  Hospital of Tropical Diseases - Oxford University Clinical Research Unit ( email )

  Vietnam
  

  Nguyen Huynh Thanh Truc

  Hospital for Tropical Diseases ( email )

  Ho Chi Minh City
  Vietnam
  

  Bui Thi Ton That

  Hospital for Tropical Diseases ( email )

  Ho Chi Minh City
  Vietnam
  

  Huynh Phuong Thao

  Hospital for Tropical Diseases ( email )

  Ho Chi Minh City
  Vietnam
  

  Tran Nguyen Phuong Thao

  Hospital for Tropical Diseases ( email )

  Ho Chi Minh City
  Vietnam
  

  Vo Trong Vuong

  Hospital for Tropical Diseases ( email )

  Ho Chi Minh City
  Vietnam
  

  Tran Thi Thanh Tam

  Hospital for Tropical Diseases ( email )

  Ho Chi Minh City
  Vietnam
  

  Ngo Tan Tai

  Hospital for Tropical Diseases ( email )

  Ho Chi Minh City
  Vietnam
  

  Ho The Bao

  Hospital for Tropical Diseases ( email )

  Ho Chi Minh City
  Vietnam
  

  Huynh Thi Kim Nhung

  Hospital for Tropical Diseases ( email )

  Ho Chi Minh City
  Vietnam
  

  Nguyen Thi Ngoc Minh

  Hospital for Tropical Diseases ( email )

  Ho Chi Minh City
  Vietnam
  

  Nguyen Thi My Tien

  Hospital for Tropical Diseases ( email )

  Ho Chi Minh City
  Vietnam
  

  Nguy Cam Huy

  Hospital for Tropical Diseases ( email )

  Ho Chi Minh City
  Vietnam
  

  Marc Choisy

  Hospital of Tropical Diseases - Oxford University Clinical Research Unit ( email )

  Vietnam
  

  Dinh Nguyen Huy Man

  Hospital for Tropical Diseases ( email )

  Ho Chi Minh City
  Vietnam
  

  Dinh Thi Bich Ty

  Hospital for Tropical Diseases ( email )

  Ho Chi Minh City
  Vietnam
  

  Nguyen To Anh

  Hospital of Tropical Diseases - Oxford University Clinical Research Unit ( email )

  Vietnam
  

  Le Thi Tam Uyen

  Hospital for Tropical Diseases ( email )

  Ho Chi Minh City
  Vietnam
  

  Tran Nguyen Hoang Tu

  Hospital for Tropical Diseases ( email )

  Ho Chi Minh City
  Vietnam
  

  Lam Minh Yen

  Hospital of Tropical Diseases - Oxford University Clinical Research Unit ( email )

  Vietnam
  

  Nguyen Thanh Dung

  Hospital for Tropical Diseases ( email )

  Ho Chi Minh City
  Vietnam
  

  Le Manh Hung

  Hospital for Tropical Diseases ( email )

  Ho Chi Minh City
  Vietnam
  

  Nguyen Thanh Truong

  Hospital for Tropical Diseases ( email )

  Ho Chi Minh City
  Vietnam
  

  Tran Tan Thanh

  Hospital of Tropical Diseases - Oxford University Clinical Research Unit ( email )

  Vietnam
  

  Guy Thwaites

  Hospital of Tropical Diseases - Oxford University Clinical Research Unit

  Vietnam
  

  Le Van Tan (Contact Author)

  Hospital of Tropical Diseases - Oxford University Clinical Research Unit ( email )

  Vietnam
  

  No contact information is available for OUCRU COVID-19 Research Group

   

  https://www.thelancet.com/ 

 

More...

Abstract

Background: Data on breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant infections are limited.

Methods: We studied breakthrough infections among healthcare workers of a major infectious diseases hospital in Vietnam. We collected demographics, vaccination history and results of PCR diagnosis alongside clinical data. We measured SARS-CoV-2 (neutralizing) antibodies at diagnosis, and at week 1, 2 and 3 after diagnosis. We sequenced the viruses using ARTIC protocol.

Findings: Between 11th–25th June 2021 (week 7–8 after dose 2), 69 healthcare workers were tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. 62 participated in the clinical study. 49 were (pre)symptomatic with one requiring oxygen supplementation. All recovered uneventfully. 23 complete-genome sequences were obtained. They all belonged to the Delta variant, and were phylogenetically distinct from the contemporary Delta variant sequences obtained from community transmission cases, suggestive of ongoing transmission between the workers. Viral loads of breakthrough Delta variant infection cases were 251 times higher than those of cases infected with old strains detected between March-April 2020. Time from diagnosis to PCR negative was 8–33 days (median: 21). Neutralizing antibody levels after vaccination and at diagnosis of the cases were lower than those in the matched uninfected controls. There was no correlation between vaccine-induced neutralizing antibody levels and viral loads or the development of symptoms.

Interpretation: Breakthrough Delta variant infections are associated with high viral loads, prolonged PCR positivity, and low levels of vaccine-induced neutralizing antibodies, explaining the transmission between the vaccinated people. Physical distancing measures remain critical to reduce SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant transmission.

Funding: Wellcome (106680/B/14/Z and 204904/Z/16/Z).

Declaration of Interest: None to declare.

Ethical Approval: The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of HTD and the Oxford Tropical Research Ethics Committee, University of Oxford, UK.

Keywords: Delta variant, Oxford-AstraZeneca, COVID-19, vaccine breakthrough, Vietnam

Suggested Citation:

Chau, Nguyen Van Vinh and Ngoc, Nghiem My and Nguyet, Lam Anh and Quang, Vo Minh and Ny, Nguyen Thi Han and Khoa, Dao Bach and Phong, Nguyen Thanh and Toan, Le Mau and Hong, Nguyen Thi Thu and Tuyen, Nguyen Thi Kim and Phat, Voong Vinh and Nhu, Le Nguyen Truc and Truc, Nguyen Huynh Thanh and That, Bui Thi Ton and Thao, Huynh Phuong and Thao, Tran Nguyen Phuong and Vuong, Vo Trong and Tam, Tran Thi Thanh and Tai, Ngo Tan and Bao, Ho The and Nhung, Huynh Thi Kim and Minh, Nguyen Thi Ngoc and Tien, Nguyen Thi My and Huy, Nguy Cam and Choisy, Marc and Man, Dinh Nguyen Huy and Ty, Dinh Thi Bich and Anh, Nguyen To and Uyen, Le Thi Tam and Tu, Tran Nguyen Hoang and Yen, Lam Minh and Dung, Nguyen Thanh and Hung, Le Manh and Truong, Nguyen Thanh and Thanh, Tran Tan and Thwaites, Guy and Tan, Le Van and Group, OUCRU COVID-19 Research, Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 Delta Variant Among Vaccinated Healthcare Workers, Vietnam. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3897733 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3897733